🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to find the right answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.